Appeals Court Rejects Election Challenge Over Residency

Appeals Court Rejects Election Challenge Over Residency

A state appeals court Wednesday rejected a lawsuit aimed at ousting a Miami city commissioner who was accused of failing to meet a residency requirement. A three-judge panel of the 3rd District Court of Appeal upheld a circuit judge’s ruling in favor of Commissioner Joe Carollo.

The lawsuit was filed after Alfonso “Alfie” Leon lost a runoff election to Carollo in November and alleged that Carollo had violated part of the city charter that requires candidates to live in their districts at least one year before qualifying to run. Leon sought to overturn the outcome of the election, arguing that Carollo was ineligible to serve.

A circuit judge dismissed the lawsuit, finding that it was an “unauthorized and improper post-election challenge” under state law, according to Wednesday’s appeals-court ruling.

The appeals court, in a 14-page opinion, said courts generally do not have the power to decide election contests after candidates have been elected. It said, however, that state law provides a “narrow exception” when candidates are ineligible for office.

But the appeals court said the one-year residency requirement in Miami’s city charter applied to candidates qualifying to run for office, not to holding office. As a result, it said the circuit judge properly dismissed the post-election challenge.

“Leon responds that if we read the … residency requirement as a qualification to run for office, rather than an eligibility requirement to hold office, there would be no eligibility requirements for city commissioners. We disagree,” said Wednesday’s opinion, written by appeals-court Judge Robert Luck and joined by Chief Judge Leslie Rothenberg and Judge Edwin Scales. “We read other parts of the city charter to impose eligibility requirements on mayors, city commissioners and other officeholders. And the Florida Constitution imposes eligibility requirements on all officeholders in the state.”

The News Service of Florida

3 Responses to "Appeals Court Rejects Election Challenge Over Residency"

  1. Preston R. Scott   May 2, 2018 at 4:52 pm

    This is what happens when lawmakers, primarily attorneys, write laws intentionally ambiguous. The issue is such common sense. The INTENT is for elected officials to live in their district – local, state, federal. I do not blame the judges…the law is poorly written. However, knowing the obvious intent it is sad those running for office cannot simply do the “right” thing.

    Reply
  2. News Maven   May 2, 2018 at 7:46 pm

    “Scott Maddox, Bill Proctor and Alan Williams were unavailable for comment.”

    Reply
  3. Snidely Whiplash   May 3, 2018 at 5:52 am

    The appeals court decision puts many Leon County citizens at a politically inconvenient crossroads.
    Do we work for legislative clarification, accept the Judges decision, or just keep complaining with even less of a legal basis to do so?
    The appeals court decision cracked open the door for Scott, Bill, and Alan to move their legal residence across the state line into Georgia. It’s just a few miles north of town and the crime rate is getting pretty high in the Tallahassee/Leon County area.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.