This very biased article completely misrepresents her claims. I’ve seen her discuss them specifically so I don’t understand how you could get something so wrong. She has spoken out about multiple issues.

“She said the state made changes in April to support its initial reopening May 4, for example by altering the way it reports the positivity rate of testing in a way she disagreed with. Instead of showing the rate of all positive tests, it began showing the rate of new positive tests — filtering out people who previously tested positive.”

“Jones also said she opposed how health officials decided to exempt rural counties below 75,000 population from more stringent criteria for reopening — such as showing a downward trajectory of new cases or case positivity in the past 14 days.”

When you get something so basic so very wrong, you deserve to lose all credibility. Your blatant tone is disgusting and only hurts you.

While she’s primarily a geographer, she does have a science degree and her doctoral emphasis was in data science. Oh and a geographer is a scientist whose area of study is geography. She actually IS a scientist. But you keep complaining about her being called a scientist. Because that’s what is important.

What a ridiculous piece of trash.