Also, will you be reporting on the bad behavior by the city manager and some of his staff disparaging (bullying) citizens who had disabilities who were speaking at the public meeting?

Finally, will you be giving credit where credit is due to the city attorney for calling out DWC on her wrong call in an attempt to walk out on a vote? The city attorney called her out on it and said there was not a conflict so no need to recuse herself. Good job City Attorney!

1. Did the two progressively-Marxist Democrats on the Commission offer any insight as to why the voted against the CRC plan?

2. Have you had the chance to research whether the City Charter originally dictated the convening of a Charter Review Committee or a “Citizens” Charter Review Committee. There is a distinction. Some years back, many municipalities and counties began to surreptitiously drop the word “Citizens” from their Charter Review Committee dictate, for obvious reasons no less. This allowed the local politicians to exclude the average tax paying citizen(s) from the process, and pack the CRC with special interest players to produce a predetermined outcome.

The problem with your new ordinance amending the Land Development Code to remove fraternities and sororities from Neighborhoods, is that you are allowing the one already there to stay sighting being “Grandfathered In”. How does that help the problem at hand since THEY are the Problem?

What’s wrong with defining the function (i.e., scope and purpose) of the CRC., approve a timeline for the CRC to meet and complete its work, approve by-laws incorporating City Commission-directed function and timing & approve acceptance of applications from potential members of the CRC?

TRANSLATION:

The inmates continue to run the insane asylum…. The city manager can now designate who to funnel funds through AKA special interests in order to gain the most return in kickbacks.

Kickback Enterprise, also known as City Hall in full throttle.