By Jim Turner, The News Service of Florida
TALLAHASSEE — Agriculture Commissioner Nikki Fried’s office would have to replace stickers that display her smiling face on gas pumps by mid-September under a House budget proposal.
The directive is tied to the House’s proposed $91.37 billion budget that was released Thursday. The budget also would require placing in reserves more than $19.7 million for other programs until plans are offered to replace the stickers, a process that Fried’s spokesman said is already underway.
The issue, which isn’t in the Senate’s budget outline, comes after a decision last year by the Republican-dominated Legislature to limit what could be shown on gas-pump inspection stickers posted by the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services.
Fried is the only Democrat elected statewide, and stickers placed on pumps after she took office last year included a picture of her.
The House’s new budget proposal includes a provision that says a portion of money for the department would be put in “reserve until the department submits a plan to the Legislative Budget Commission for removing stickers affixed by the department to petroleum fuel tanks.”
Fred Piccolo, a spokesman for House Speaker Jose Oliva, R-Miami Lakes, said the House is taking the steps because Fried didn’t carry out the Legislature’s directive last year to replace the stickers that included her picture.
“The Legislature made it clear last session that the placing of a likeness of oneself on official inspection materials was unseemly, self-promoting and contrary to taxpayer interests,” Piccolo said in an email. “Commissioner (Fried) chose to ignore that directive. The House in 2020 is reiterating last year’s requirement and exercising our constitutional prerogative to decide what is and is not funded.”
But Franco Ripple, a spokesman for the Fried, called the House proposal “outrageous” and contended that shifting money to reserves over the issue would endanger a variety of consumer protections.
“It jeopardizes active criminal investigations, 61,000 lab analyses, almost 9,000 fair ride inspections, and the handling of nearly 400,000 consumer inquiries and complaints, over gas pump stickers that are already being replaced,” Ripple said. “Because of this (budget) proviso language, the jobs of 284 hardworking state employees could be at risk — perhaps indefinitely.”
Franco estimated the reserve proposal would impact about $9.45 million for the department’s Bureau of Standards, $4.3 million for the Bureau of Compliance, $2.35 million for the Bureau of Mediation and Enforcement, $1.8 million for the Bureau of Fair Rides, $1.3 million for the Outreach Section and $490,733 for the Board of Surveyors and Mappers.
The clash came days after Fried decried as a partisan “power grab” an effort backed by all but one member of the House Agriculture & Natural Resources Appropriations to relocate the Office of Energy from her department to Gov. Ron DeSantis’ administration.
The fight over the stickers has festered for more than a year, since her office started to replace stickers that had been placed on pumps when Republican Adam Putnam was the agriculture commissioner.
The new stickers went up as pumps were checked for illegal “skimmer” devices intended to steal credit card information.
At least part of the concern was that the stickers with Fried’s picture were being used to gain free political exposure for a re-election bid or a run for higher office in 2022.
Under Putnam, the stickers featured the department logo, along with a code intended to direct consumers to an online help site to express concerns about fraud.
While the budget last year dictated changes that would remove her picture, Fried’s office took that as a prohibition on buying more of the bright yellow, green and blue stickers, but not to stop using them.
Her office had spent $5,000 for 120,000 inspection stickers. Most were in place by the time the budget for the current fiscal year went into effect on July 1.
Last year, Fried said the stickers were about accountability. In addition to Fried’s face, the stickers say, “inspected and approved for accuracy,” along with her name and a consumer assistance web address and phone number.
Franco said new stickers are already being attached to pumps across the state.
The new design includes the department’s logo, the commissioner’s name and contact information below a statement of “Approved for Accuracy,” all atop a background in blue shades that depict ranch and farm images.
Everyone from appointed agency types to elected officials puts their picture out. We spend millions changing websites, billboards and stickers to satisfy this self promotion agenda. All of this could be reduced by requiring the cost (both materials and labor) to be borne by the benefiting official.
Instead of spending the Money changing them NOW, just wait until the next Inspection and do it then as I think they are inspected once a Year.
Or just elect someone else, next time. Also standardize the ballots. Pretty sure last time there were some weird issues on both sides but the math doesn’t add up to one lone Democrat getting voted into the cabinet. Not that Putnam was anything to get excited about.
Stopped at a Shell in Lake City recently where someone had drawn a BIG Curly Mustache on her pic…gave me a good chuckle.
It’s ironic to me that we see elected officials as having less freedom – freedom of speech and expression – than others. Just because they are elected to office doesn’t mean they lose their creative license. One might be quick to say, “but not on our tax dollars,” yet she would otherwise be free to choose color, emblem, font, etc. I do not agree her photo on these inspection stickers is any different than adopting her own choice of emblem. *Speculation* on what it *might* or *could* infer in the future is irrelevant.
Really folks, the First Amendment covers everyone. I might not *like* her picture on the stickers, but I defend her right to do it.
And at the end of the day, don’t we have more important issues to address than the design of an inspection sticker that excludes any ancillary partisan declarations?
You’re right Art. If she wants to express her views on gay marriage, death penalty, foreign trade policy, abortion, homeland security, immigration, gun control, etc., on these stickers, she should have every right. Personally, I think she should have shown more cleavage, amirite?
By that reasoning, Mr. Kirby – if we get a new Republican Commissioner of Agriculture elected after Nikki, and he (or she) decides to put up a fuel pump sticker with President Trump’s picture that says “Four More Years!” under the photo and above the relevant Agriculture Dept. info, then the Republican Commissioner is perfectly entitled to do so. In your own words: “Just because they are elected to office doesn’t mean they lose their creative license. You “may not not *like* Trump’s picture on the stickers, but I defend his (or her) right to do it.”
It’s a bad road to go down and cuts both ways, so let’s just stick to the basic state logo and official information – instead of making state stickers into mini-political statements for any elected official.
The sticker I saw the other day had a large frowny face emoji pasted on top of her face…hilarious.
I say leave ‘me up and let consumers have some creative fun drawing Frito Bandito ‘stashes and sticking funny emoji over them.
Here is a suggestion…….. Don’t they get replaced Annually to show they were Inspected…….Just change them out THEN and not waste TIME and Money.
Remove all politicians pictures from every external and internal websites, including agency heads, etc. ( All political appointees. And their names from every road sign.)
Tell Franco Ripple that had Ms. Fried not decided to promote herself and then continue to support herself after she was instructed not to we would not be discussing this.
No different than Rick Scott’s name on all the Welcome to Florida signs at the state line roads. And at least we don’t have to look at Matt Caldwell or Adam “Opie Taylor” Putnam.
As a fiscal conservative, I completely agree. The tax collectors are the worst. Do we really need to see their names in 20pt font on envelopes, faces on mailings, signs, etc.? It adds zero value for the tax payer. They should create a law that limits the use of taxpayer dollars for this blatant free advertising of elected officials.
She should be fined the $5000 dollars plus state employee pay to cover cost of sticker and replacing them.